in Art
Kimball Arts Center Moving to Bonanza Park in September
The Kimball Arts Center announced today that it has found a new temporary home. In September it will be moving to 1401 Kearns Boulevard .
Robin Marrouche, Executive Director of the Kimball Art Center said, “The opportunity to build an entirely new facility that is truly customized to best fit the needs of our patrons is hands down the best way for us to continue to cultivate an arts culture here in Park City and beyond – and this temporary home is the first step toward realizing that exciting goal.”
Here is the press release:
KIMBALL ART CENTER SECURES NEW TEMPORARY HOME IN PARK CITY
The Kimball will move to 1401 Kearns Boulevard in September 2015
PARK CITY, Utah (May 18, 2015) – Today, the Kimball Art Center announced that it has signed a lease for a temporary location in Park City as part of a planned expansion project designed to increase access to the non-profit’s diverse and inspiring art education, exhibitions and events.
The Kimball Art Center’s new location will be located just a mile from Main Street in the Bonanza Park area at 1401 Kearns Boulevard. The organization plans on residing there for approximately three years while a new permanent art center is designed and built.
This transition to the new facility will take place in September 2015, and there will be no interruption in classes during this shift. Events such as the 46th Annual Park City Kimball Arts Festival will also continue as planned, kicking off on July 31st, 2015. While in the temporary space, the Kimball Art Center plans on exploring new educational offerings and experimenting with new programming for the future permanent home that fosters even greater appreciation and understanding of the arts among patrons.
“This is a really transformational time for the Kimball Art Center, as we will been looking for ways to grow and evolve to better serve the community we love so much,” said Robin Marrouche, Executive Director of the Kimball Art Center. “The opportunity to build an entirely new facility that is truly customized to best fit the needs of our patrons is hands down the best way for us to continue to cultivate an arts culture here in Park City and beyond – and this temporary home is the first step toward realizing that exciting goal.”
To better serve a continuously increasing demand from the community for the Kimball Art Center’s extensive art programs and offerings, the center’s Board of Directors made the decision to sell the current facility on Park City’s Historic Main Street. The sale of the current building, which closed earlier this month, will allow the Kimball Art Center to transition into its new space with increased square footage and improved parking and accessibility.
About the Kimball Art Center
Since 1976, the Kimball Art Center (KAC) has been the heart of Park City’s historic and vibrant arts community. The non-profit center for the arts is committed to engaging individuals of all ages in diverse and inspiring experiences through education, exhibitions and events – including the annual Park City Kimball Arts Festival, Utah’s original and longest-running visual arts festival, now in its 46th year. As the KAC’s biggest fundraiser, proceeds from the festival allow the center to provide free, year-round art exhibitions, gallery tours, monthly “Art Talks” as well as art education outreach to teachers, students and the community.
For more information on the KAC and its numerous community offerings and programs, please visit www.kimballartcenter.org.
Perhaps I Was Too Excited About The Mountain Accord Tunnel Being Scrapped
Yesterday I wrote that a Mountain Accord meeting on Monday indicated that the tunnel between Brighton and PCMR was dead. Let’s just say that I may have been wrong … or perhaps more precisely that the nails aren’t quite in the coffin yet.
I have received feedback from the community indicating where the potential for the tunnel, to come back to life, exists. Let’s look at some of those:
- A meeting of many of the parties associated with the Accord on Monday agreed to remove the tunnel from the “proposed actions” for the environmental phase (NEPA) of the Mountain Accord. Yet, this removal still needs to be voted on. Between now and that point lies a Mountain Accord retreat which could alter perspectives, and votes, of Accord members. So, removing the tunnel may not become reality… or more likely language will be constructed to make it appear that the tunnel is dead … but in reality it will be like one of those zombie movies where it will show its ugly head once again.
- Imminent domain could still put the tunnel in play. Imminent domain is the right of the state or federal government to do what they want for the “general good.” The Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) could still decide they want a tunnel and theoretically nothing could stop it.
- If you look at the proposed language that is said to be added to the Mountain Accord Blueprint, it basically says “nothing can be done to someone” and that supposedly protects us from the Mountain Accord building a tunnel if we don’t want it. Yet, you have to ask who is “we”. Not to get all Monica Lewinsky and Bill Clinton on you, but the definition of “we” is important. In this case the “we” is the Park City City Council. The Park City Council actually represents a small portion of people in the area, compared to Summit County whose Summit County Council encompasses all the Snyderville Basin residents. Because of this, you have to account for the fact that Park City council people could be coopted into supporting a tunnel and there is nothing that most of us could do about it.
- Throughout the process, there have been allegations of conflicts of interest with regard to members of the Mountain Accord Executive Committee. Some of these alleged conflicts are with people at the highest levels of government. Since there has formally been nothing agreed upon, Mountain Accord representatives would tell you that there are no conflicts. That may be true and you should believe what you want, but what you should be concerned with is the process that this whole proposal will follow. If I’ve learned anything from following local government, is that there is usually an agenda. If there wasn’t, most actions wouldn’t be started. And the motto, “if at first you don’t succeed, try try again” is at the fore-front of my mind. The people running Mountain Accord are at least 3 steps ahead of the rest of us. If somone who is really important demands a tunnel to Park City, this minor setback won’t stop them. And in a process as complicated as this, there are plenty of places to re-insert that little hole through the mountain.
If you speak with those people in the know about the death of the tunnel, you’d likely describe them as cautiously optimistic. That said, I’m sure each of them would also advise constant vigilance.
Given quite a few discussions over the last 24 hours, I’d recommend that too.
in Development
My How Park City has Changed
An anonymous person sent a link to one of the greatest visualizations of Park City growth since 1984. This is one of those must sees.
Watch below or click here for a bigger view.
h/t to the person who sent this
in Schools
Live Blogging the School Board Master Planning Meeting
The Park City School Board Master Planning Committee is meeting tonight. This is the final, of 3 meeting regarding building needs in the district. I am live blogging the meeting.
Park City Citizens Have Made a Difference With Regard to Mountain Accord
Park City and Snyderville Basin residents… We salute you.
On Monday, the Mountain Accord Executive Committee met to discuss comments they have received over the last few months. One of the outcomes of the meeting, according to local leader and activist Rich Wyman, who attended the session, is that the tunnel between Brighton and Park City has been scrapped from the proposed actions for the NEPA process. According to Mr. Wyman, Park City City Council member Andy Beerman and Summit County Council Member Chris Robinson told the Mountain Accord Executive Committee that their constituents were not in support of a tunnel connection to Park City. The Executive Committee evidently listened to our representatives and will likely remove the tunnel option from the Mountain Accord proposed actions.
In addition, it was stated that the following language would be added to the Mountain Accord Blueprint:
“Mountain Accord decisions are consensus based and do not supersede federal, state, and local jurisdictions’ authority. Local jurisdictions that have consented in the consensus based process shall seek to implement agreed-up scenarios or actions within their jurisdiction through zoning, general plan, and other tools available. Local jurisdictions are not obligated to implement actions with which they are not in agreement.”
This language was likely added because of Roger Armstrong, and other Summit County Council members, who demanded that the citizens of Summit County would not be forced, against our will, into allowing actions decided on by the Mountain Accord representatives.
While we still need to wait for the final language to be added to the next iteration of the Mountain Accord Blueprint, this appears to be a victory for the people of Park City and the Snyderville Basin. It proves that by getting involved, showing up at public meetings (like the Mountain Accord Meeting at the high school), and writing emails, that we can all make a difference. Without the people voicing their concerns, activists like Mr. Wyman raising awareness, and certain elected representatives willing to take a stand, the outcome likely would have been different. The Mountain Accord would probably have submitted a proposal to the government that included a tunnel to Park City and that tunnel probably would have turned into reality.
For at least now, that concern seems to be abated. In the future we may need to fight again to prevent a tunnel to Park City but today we can now concentrate on the good parts of the Mountain Accord — the environmental aspects.
It’s a good day to be part of a democratic republic. It’s a good day to know that your opinion actually counts and makes a difference.
Park City and Basin residents, if I could throw you a party I would.
You done good.
Update: I heard from Rich Wyman with regard to this article. He thought it was important to point out that the train was likely being scrapped from the proposed actions for the NEPA process. While he is optimistic that this is a great step towards ensuring that the train isn’t part of The mountain accord, nothing is definite yet. He said that additional conversations and votes had to happen to make this become a reality. Therefore, I have updated the story to reflect that as best as possible. Thanks to Rich for pointing this out.
in Schools
Students are Learning That They Need Constant Vigilance Too
In some twist of irony it’s a little amusing that students are upset over the high school’s media center being repurposed as a location for PC CAPS. The purpose of PC CAPS is to give students real world experience. Yet, these students who are complaining about the school board making a decision look like they need to understand how the real world works. As one student put it, “They didn’t ask us. They should have, because we are the people who are going to be negatively impacted by this out-of-the-blue decision.”
I know I sound a bit condescending, and when I was in high school I would have been complaining too, just like these students. I probably wouldn’t have even been as good as these kids … I wouldn’t have even considered writing a letter to the paper. Yet that doesn’t change the fact that the school board did tell students, parents, and the community that they were considering making this change. It was announced on a School Board Meeting agenda. It was discussed on the radio. It was all available online. I believe there is even a student council representative “on” the School Board.
What these students are learning is the same thing I’ve been learning since I started Park Rag. Civic involvement isn’t a part time job. You have to be constantly aware of what is happening with local government. You have to voice your concerns ahead of time. If you don’t, all you can do is complain and that doesn’t go very far.
If you are a student and are interested in becoming more involved, I’d love to have you write with us at the Park Rag. English doesn’t even have to be your forte’ (it obviously isn’t mine). What we have to offer is a passion for local government and Park City. We provide a reason for following what’s happening in Park City and an outlet for your voice. What we try to do is cover the school board, Park City City Council, the Summit County Council, and events that impact Park City like Mountain Accord. We want to let as many people as possible know about what’s going on and provide a perspective that may not be found elsewhere.
While perhaps the Park Rag doesn’t have the cachet that PC CAPS has, we provide many of the same things. We offer the chance to work in the real world, an opportunity to hone your critical reasoning skills, and a good story to tell colleges. You also get to help make Park City a better place.
I hope you’ll consider making a difference in both your life and Park City. If you’re interested, please email .
in Schools
Will Student Backlash Against The Library Conversion for PC CAPS Cause the School Board to Re-Consider a PC CAPS Building?
In today’s Park there are two letters to the editor and a full article on students who oppose converting the high school library’s media center into an area for PC CAPS. The students are complaining that they weren’t consulted about the decision.
What should be interesting is whether this causes the School Board, and its Master Planning Committee, to reconsider building a full PC CAPS building as part of it plans to renovate the Kearns campus. Last October, amid public concern, the district decided not to build a $5 million PC CAPS building.
If there is enough push back from students, it would be easy to see them tacking the CAPS building onto their renovation plans.
It should be interesting to watch.
Update on Mountain Accord
Park City leader and activist, Rich Wyman, attended a meeting on Monday of the Mountain Accord Executive Committee. The meeting was intended to be a review of citizen comments received about the Accord.
Here are some of the important meeting points, as highlighted by Mr Wyman:
-
Joan DeGiorgio, of the Nature Conservancy, was made a member of the Executive Board.
-
The Brighton to Park City segment is not included in the Mountain Accord Phase II NEPA scope (neither tunnel nor aerial options).
-
Mountain Accord decisions are consensus based and do not supersede federal, state, and local jurisdictions’ authority. Local jurisdictions that have consented in the consensus based process shall seek to implement agreed-up scenarios or actions within their jurisdiction through zoning, general plan, and other tools available. Local jurisdictions are not obligated to implement actions with which they are not in agreement.
- Program Manager,Laynee Jones said, “This paragraph [the abovebullet] will not be in the ILA [inter local agreement between government bodies] because some participants have already signed it and it will take too much time to start that process over again. This paragraphwill be incorporated to the new blueprint this summer.”
- It appears Utah County and American Fork want to be a part of the Mountain Accord.
I’ve left out some of the detailed commentary from Mr. Wyman related to each point. That said, it appears he believes that while many of these points are promising, it is important to keep our focus on what’s important to us and make sure the Executive Committee follows through with these statements. As he points out, “nothing has been voted on yet.”
He attributes many of these gains to Summit County leaders who have pushed back and said they want specific language stating that localities are in control of their destiny. In my opinion, some of our Summit County leaders have done a good job of walking a fine line that will hopefully protect us in the future from pieces of the Accord that could harm Summit County.
As they say, the proof will be in the pudding once the next iteration of the Mountain Accord Blueprint is released in the coming months. I personally hope what My Wyman heard is translated into hard facts in the next iteration of the agreement.
Regardless, the fight isn’t over and we all still require constant vigilance. As of now, though, the sunrise looks a little more promising today than it did yesterday.
h/t to Mr Wyman for attending the meeting and providing a good overview of what was discussed.
Summit County Needs to Treat the New Whole Foods as More Than a Grocer
This week, the Snyderville Basin Planning Commission will hear public comment on the Canyons’s Corner development, which is the parking lot across from Ruby Tuesday’s, near Walmart. The developer wants to put a new Whole Foods grocery and additional retail space on the property.
The Planning Commission will be hearing from the public and potentially deciding on whether this development should be built as proposed (or not). Personally, I love the idea of the greater selection a larger Whole Foods would offer. I also love the idea of their beer and wine offerings. According to Whole Foods press release (announced of course before this has even been approved… by accident I’m sure):
“This store will be the first Whole Foods Market in Utah to feature its own taproom with local beer and wine on tap, as well as a world-class resort pub menu with separate fast casual dining and pub seating inside the store.”
Yet there-in lies the problem. Is this a grocery store or a grocery store with a bar and restaurant inside it? There seems to be a lot of publicity from Whole Foods around a “taproom”, if it’s just a regular grocery store.
Why do I care? There are certain requirements that a bar has to have per our development code. First, if this store is really a bar, it has to have a conditional use permit issued by the County. This allows people to state their opinion on this specific piece. Let’s say you loved Whole Foods but were anti-alcohol, you could show up to the Planning Commission and debate the alcohol piece. There are some details that make the question of whether this requires a Conditional Use permit a little murky (i.e. was the original development agreement a specially planned area and does that somehow supercede zoning) but the average person would say that adding a bar should follow our zoning laws and a Conditional Use Permit would be required for their tap room. That would give the public a chance to voice any concerns about this portion of the business.
The second I reason I care is based on affordable housing requirements. It is likely that this agreement will require either affordable housing to be built or the developer will have to pay fees in lieu of building affordable housing. For bars and restaurants, one of the key components in calculating the amount of affordable housing required is almost 2 times as big for bars and restaurants versus commercial/retail. Our County Planning office is currently treating this as a pure commercial facility, which means that the level of affordable housing required is understated. The County calculates the number of affordable housing units (or fees) required based on the square feet. In this case, the question is what percentage of space will be used for a restaurant, bar, taproom, chairs, storage, food prep, etc. versus the general grocery. Whatever that restaurant/bar space is should be “charged” at twice the Affordable Housing rate (per code).
While I still have questions about traffic and what moving Whole Foods will mean to traffic along the frontage road, I support it. The company obviously thinks there is a need and are willing to expand their operations and hire more people. That’s good for the Snyderville Basin. That said, they should be forced to follow the same rules as everyone else and account for their affordable housing like what they really are. In this case that’s a bar, restaurant, and grocery.
in Environment
3.0 Earthquake Strikes Snyderville Basin
At 11:45 AM Saturday morning a 3.0 magnitude earthquake struck our area. The US Geological Survey says the epicenter was 7 miles north of Summit Park. Many residents reported feeling the quake with one saying “that her house shook violently” and another “It was so jarring that I first thought a truck had hit the building and then I wondered, earthquake?”
I hope this is an isolated event and not just a trimmer before something larger. As always, it’s a good time to get yourself prepared.
Update: People at Basin Rec Fieldhouse reported hearing two large booms around that time…perhaps weights falling.
Parkrag
We believe in citizen journalism. We believe there are stories to tell that can help to shape our community for the better. We believe tomorrow's Park City can be better than today's.